![]() Often, the stuff and thoughts I have put there are much more important than the main text which evoked the footnote. The whole, however, has a value-added over and above its parts, and my hope is that the two works will become valuable reference material for the “student” of shipping and ports both the young and the young at heart.Īgain, as in the 2017 editorial, I strongly advise the reader not to skip the many footnotes I have used. Knowing that parallel reading won’t happen in most cases, some duplication with the 2017 editorial became unavoidable for the sake of completeness of my exposition. This has always been the MEL philosophy, whenever it came to the definition of “maritime economics”, or “maritime logistics” (a term coined by this journal in 2003 Footnote 1). Ideally, the two works should be read in parallel, for it is difficult to understand ports without a good understanding of international shipping and vice versa. ![]() ![]() This editorial is a sequel to my 2017 editorial “Globalization, public sector reform, and the role of ports in international supply chains” (Haralambides 2017). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |